One workbench.
Your whole team's workflows.
Stop everyone building agents in their own silo. Workbench gives your team a shared catalog of governed workflows — with humans approving at the gates and permissions computed before a run, not discovered after.
The problem
Everyone building alone produces slop
One-off agents are cool at first, then degrade until nobody trusts the output. The pattern shows up on every call we take:
- "Everyone's using it their own way. It's just a mess."
- "It's just starting to put out slop now. Nobody's listening to it anymore."
- "We don't have data in one spot — it makes the work sloppy."
“Their agents ask forgiveness. Your workflows ask approval.”
How it works
From catalog to output, with you at the gates
Pick a workflow from the catalog
A shared library the whole team launches from. Each workflow shows its steps — automated, AI, or yours — before you run it.
Approve what it can touch
The platform computes exactly what permissions the workflow needs before it executes. An operator approves them — nothing runs on discovered access.
Launch, and decide at the gates
Runs pause where your judgment matters and tell you up front how many times they will. No fully automated pipelines.
Output lands in the library
Artifacts arrive versioned, attributed, and reviewable — and runs survive crashes and redeploys along the way.
Opinionated by design
Most agent tools ship open-ended autonomy and let you find the edges in production. Workbench takes positions.
Shared, not siloed
Best practices flow through the workflows, not through Slack messages. Standardized output quality across the team.
Specialized, not sprawling
Focused agents with one job each outlast the do-everything agent that degrades into noise.
Durable by construction
Code changes don't kill running workflows. Old versions persist for compliance.
What your AI leadership sees
Every workflow step reports automatically — adoption, spend, and audit come built in, not bolted on.
Forensics & Insights
The reporting layer over everything your team runs in Workbench. Who did what, what it cost, and the record to prove it.
Common questions
That's what the catalog absorbs. You adopt workflows, not an architecture bet, and swap them as the landscape moves.
We deploy and operate the instance for you. Your team picks workflows and answers approval gates — that's the whole learning curve.
Permissions are enforced at the runtime, not in the prompt. A workflow can only touch what an operator approved before it ran — an injected instruction can't grant new access.
Vendor suites automate inside one vendor's walls, and the shared-workflow problem — skills, approval, evaluation across your team — is exactly what they leave behind. Workbench is cross-vendor by design.
A pilot on one or two workflows your team actually runs, deployed and operated for you. Expand when the output earns it.
See a workflow your team would actually run
Twenty minutes, live in Workbench, on a use case you pick — whether or not you use Interchange.